Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 01:41

Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
What are some ways to cope with paranoid thoughts about being gangstalked or targeted individuals?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Some in Steelers Building Wanted to Go Back to Justin Fields in 2024 - Sports Illustrated
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Wells Fargo Stock Rises as Fed Lifts Asset Cap After 7 Years - Barron's
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
What’s next?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
People Are Reporting A Frightening COVID Symptom Right Now — Here's What To Know - HuffPost
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Thank you.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Which country of the world has the largest business network?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.